Source + Photos: My Daily, Today Korea, Money Today, Suwon via Naver
by VITALSIGNon March 10, 2011
已故張子妍親筆信,經細節分析,發現多處偽造跡象~警方日前透露,在所謂的張子妍親筆信上發現多處偽造跡象.
警方在自稱為張子妍熟人的A某牢房里搜出了信封等物件,經過分析比對,發現了一些偽造跡象.10日,京畿地方警察廳發佈這一調查結果.據警方稱,張子妍親筆信的信封右側上方郵戳部位有剪貼的痕跡,發信人無味也有細微的複印痕跡.又,“這可視為是為了隱藏信件的發出地.爲了不讓發信地區出現故意對郵局郵戳做了剪貼”.
通過對教導所郵局收發情況的調查發現,A某在教導所服刑的2003年到2011年3月7日期間,共收發信件2千4百余封,但其中沒有任何一封有署名張子妍,或者A某的筆名“雪花”.此外,還在牢房里發現了用於複印的A4勇植1千多張.警方去年9月從A某牢房搜獲的24封張子妍信件原本當時被作為證據資料提交給了法庭,經發現,此次發現的複印本和原本的內容一致.對此,警方表示,“現在下結論還為時過早.得看最終調查結果”.
Yesterday, the National Institute of Scientific Investigation claimed that Jang Ja Yeon’s letters could have been fabricated. Today, SBS’s “8 o’clock News” released an interview with the chief of the International Forensic Science Laboratory, who refuted the reports of fabrication.
On March 10th, SBS reported that they had given copies of Jang Ja Yeon’s letters to a professional for a second opinion. After thoroughly studying the documents, Lee Hee Il, chief of the IFSL, revealed, “In these letters, the way that certain characters like ‘yo’ and ‘ya’ were written coincide directly with the writing habits of the late actress Jang Ja Yeon. The way the consonants and vowels were written are exactly alike, proving that these letters were written by the same person.” 
Comparison of the handwriting in the letter on the left, to Jang Ja Yeon's original handwriting on the right
SBS further added, “It is virtually impossible for Jun to have perfected the handwriting of Jang Ja Yeon by copying the picture of her suicide note from a newspaper. He could not have written 230 letters in her copied handwriting with such limited information, and it is also unlikely that three years worth of letters were merely the result of a concocted plan.”
They continued, “The letters also reveal detailed information regarding her agency’s advancement plans, as well as information on the figures she ‘hosted’ that others would not be able to know. If anything, the letters and envelopes show that Jun tried his best to make sure that Jang Ja Yeon’s identity was not leaked through the letters.”
NISI official reporting to the media that Jang Ja Yeon's letters might be fabricated
A congressman of the democratic party also recently demanded that the investigators and police stop lying to the public about this alleged “fabrication”. He demanded, “The police are fooling the public. This is not the first time that investigators and the police pretended to reveal ‘information’ to the public without any proper evidence or information on even a portion of the case. You must stop this immediately.”
Netizens also refused to believe the reports by commenting, “Just because the envelopes were damaged does not mean that the details of the letters were fabricated.”
On March 8th, a women’s organization had opened a press conference in front of the Ministry of Gender Equality & Family building and demanded that proper investigations be made.
Once the Ministry failed to react or respond, one netizen began a silent one man protest in front of the Ministry of Gender Equality Building for two hours on March 10th. He held a sign that read, “A Ministry of Gender Equality & Family that remains silent in the face of Jang Ja Yeon’s controversy has no right to exist in this nation.”
近日南韓娛樂圈充斥著逃兵役，醉酒駕駛，暴力，性交易以及賭博等各種醜聞。
3月6日SBS電視台公開了2年前因性交易自殺身亡的張紫妍的生前親筆書信，至此「張紫妍性交易事件」又浮出水面。雖然是2年前發生的悲劇但和張紫 妍有著密切關系的「31名陪睡名單」近日在網絡曝光後引起大眾一片嘩然。2年前在其自殺時雖也有陪酒陪睡新聞爆出，但在不久之後就被人遺忘。隨著張紫妍親 筆書信的登場又再次成為輿論的焦點，再加上「陪睡名單」的曝光更如同添了一把火，甚至警察和法務部也稱會再次行動。之後張紫妍的生前信件是否真為其親筆所 寫也成為熱議對象，不過現在定論孰是孰非還為時尚早。
張紫妍事件也引發了不少娛樂圈其他的話題，高修,Alex的熱戀，Crown J的暴力事件和醉酒駕駛，再到MC夢的逃兵役事件都引發了不小的風波，真相如何無人能解。為什麼會引起連串效應？答案非常簡單，因為不管發生任何事情藝人 的第一反應就是先搪塞過去，不管怎樣先否認，等證據一一呈現在他們面前時才開口承認。
當然娛樂圈所傳出的各種新聞中不是沒有假造的，戀愛門，賭博門和暴力門也迫害著那些清白的藝人們，這通常都是一些網站的貼吧和某明星的黑粉的「傑作」，去年Tablo的學歷造假事件就有蹟可尋。
無故抹黑藝人絕對事件錯事，但俗話說「無風不起浪」，藝人們雖然也享有自己的生活但卻需要在公眾場合學會自制和小心，這裡筆者並不是要求藝人們單方面作出犧牲，萬事皆由緣，藝人的事情有可能在自己不注意的時候就被傳播出去。一有事情就想「裝糊塗蒙混過關」的藝人們自己也存在不小的問題，小事見人心，希望他們不要因為瑣碎的事情失去民心。
留言列表
